An Avalanche of Economic Impact Data

Posted by Ben Davidson On July - 9 - 2012

Ben Davidson

Way back in May of 2009, Americans for the Arts began recruiting local, regional, and statewide partners for the Arts & Economic Prosperity IV national economic impact study. After three years of day-to-day project managing, data collecting, number crunching, and report writing, the study is finally complete and the findings have been released. Trust me, NO ONE is more excited about that than I am!

A research project of this scope and magnitude delivers a myriad of emotional highs and lows. Mistakes are made; then mistakes are fixed. Deadlines are missed; then “extended” deadlines are set. We all know the drill.

I am 100 percent certain that at least once, each of the 182 study partners wished I would just go away and leave them alone. I’m incredibly thankful that each of the partners stuck with the process. Their hard work made this study the largest and most comprehensive of its kind ever conducted. Many people have asked me about the specific challenges and successes of the project, and I’m happy to share my perspectives on a few of each.

CHALLENGES

1. Providing project oversight for 182 separate partners is a difficult task. It’s a frustrating feeling when you send an e-mail to 182 people, and your inbox immediately starts filling with requests for clarification. I knew immediately when my directions weren’t clear enough.

2. Utilizing multiple sources of data can be confusing. In the states where the Cultural Data Project (CDP) has been implemented, we used CDP data in addition to our AEP IV organizational survey (so that arts organizations submitting a CDP profile didn’t need to complete our survey as well). This tactic definitely reduced the burden on the organizations from which we needed to collect data. Unfortunately, it definitely increased the burden on my team and on our study partners located in those CDP states.

3. The fact that the study partners collected more than 150,000 audience-intercept surveys was both a blessing and a curse. It was a blessing because it is unquestionably the largest sample of audience spending data that has ever been collected. It was a curse because that equates to 32 legal-sized boxes full of surveys that required sorting, coding, and data entry. As my team processed the mountain of surveys, we stacked the boxes in my office. This worked fine until one Monday morning when I arrived at the office and discovered that a stack nine boxes high had collapsed across my desk—spilling neatly bundled surveys out into the hall, crushing my work phone, and staining my office door with blue ink from the boxes. Colleagues said I was lucky that I wasn’t at my desk when it happened, but I thought it might have been a fitting way to meet my demise… 

The great audience survey collapse of 2012 in my office.

MILESTONES & SUCCESSES

1. I received the first shipment of completed audience-intercept surveys from ArtsMemphis (thanks Karen!) on January 26, 2011. At that point, there was no turning back.

2. Early in the process we knew that the fiscal year we were studying was on the tail end of the Great Recession. Cultural organizations were facing unprecedented funding challenges during FY2010; some were even closing their doors permanently. More than once I said that the headline for the findings would likely be “Researchers Choose Wrong Year To Conduct Economic Impact Study.” But the findings are once again a GOOD NEWS story for the nonprofit arts in America. In spite of the economic challenges that all industries faced in 2010—crests in unemployment and foreclosures, troughs in consumer confidence and discretionary spending, and declines in overall attendance to arts events, professional sports, and leisure travel—the nonprofit arts have proven to be a resilient industry that supports local jobs and generates government revenue…even during the worst recession of our lifetime!

3. Meeting so many of the study partners at our Annual Convention in San Antonio last month was my personal highlight. I found value in watching the partners become more comfortable with the data during the daylong media training preconference. I was happy for the opportunity to answer their questions and to thank them for their hard work.

4. Largest. Study. Ever.

I’m proud of the work that my team and our partners accomplished on the Arts & Economic Prosperity IV study.

Of course, I’ll need some time before I’m ready for AEP V!

One Response to “An Avalanche of Economic Impact Data”

  1. [...] the fact that a lot of work on the part of many, many people went into creating it. Ben Davidson tells some of the behind the scenes tales, Maria Munoz-Blanco draws a picture of impact, and Createquity superfan Paul Tyler describes the [...]

Leave a Reply

ARTSblog holds week-long Blog Salons, a series of posts by guest bloggers, that focus on an overarching theme within a core area of Americans for the Arts' work. Here are links to the most recent Salons:

Arts Education

Teaching Artists

Early Arts Education

Common Core Standards

Quality, Engagement & Partnerships

Emerging Leaders

Charting the Future of the Arts

Taking Communities to the Next Level

New Methods & Models

Public Art

Best Practices

Evaluation

Arts Marketing

Audience Engagement

Winning Audiences

Powered by Community

Animating Democracy

Arts & the Military

Scaling Up Programs & Projects

Social Impact & Evaluation

Humor & Social Change

Private Sector Initatives

Arts & Business Partnerships

Business Models in the Arts

Local Arts Agencies

Cultural Districts

Economic Development

Trends, Collaborations & Audiences

Art in Rural Communities

Alec Baldwin and Nigel Lythgoe talk about the state of the arts in America at Arts Advocacy Day 2012. The acclaimed actor and famed producer discuss arts education and what inspires them.