Letitia Fernandez Ivins

bang Bang BANG

Posted by Letitia Fernandez Ivins, Aug 12, 2010 3 comments


Letitia Fernandez Ivins

This title is neither violent onomatopoeia nor a Femi Kuti reference, rather I quote my mom’s favorite phrase which is synonymous to “check, check, check.”  While I’d cringe whenever my mom exclaimed this in her Filipino accent, I think it captures my enthusiasm around the three key accomplishments (some unexpected) that resulted from the Los Angeles emerging leader mentorship program.

People rarely wield the science to invent and hand-craft their own mentor. I’ve observed that mentors tend to emerge in unlikely places and heighten or recede in their presence throughout one’s life. But, in 2007, a nine-member taskforce of Los Angeles Emerging Arts Leaders (EAL/LA) had lost patience with an organic model of mentor acquisition, and began scheming on how to meet a dream career mentor through professional connections and a structured program.

After a year of monthly meetings to strategize recruitment, the matching process, the structure, marketing, and evaluation, we officially launched the Arts Professional Advisors Link (APAL) in the fall of 2008. Each emerging leader member completed an “application” which described professional development needs and wants in a mentor. As a team, we reviewed one another’s applications and leveraged our connections, to help match advisors to the profiles drawn up in the applications. Advisees were charged with all of the administrative work around the program and were to initiate and organize all advisor meetings (four at the least) over the course of the program year. The advisee was to steer the content of the meeting conversations and bring clear, yearlong goals to the table around which the advisor might provide guidance. Over the course of the year, we threw a kick-off orientation mixer, a mid-year opera outing and mixer and a culminating mixer.

Come winter 2009, the EAL/LA had completed its pilot mentorship program, APAL, an experiment which yielded unexpected, yet empowering results. bang.  You can read more about creating mentorship programs in your community by using this Mentorship Toolkit.

What I found most remarkable about both the planning process and execution of APAL was the initiative, resourcefulness, and commitment of the APAL taskforce (ultimately termed “hub”). While the success of the advisor/advisee relationships varied, hub members agree that the development of the APAL program was perhaps as professionally fulfilling as the mentorships themselves. The group of 8 members of the pilot program brewed in a bond-making process over the course of two full planning and execution years. Throughout, we counseled, commiserated, consoled, cavorted, even stepped back to concoct a framework for the then fledgling EAL/LA network. (Two of the original planning hub members were swept away by Graduate school and another chose to focus his extracurricular attention to art-making, so the planning hub invited three additional advisees to participate in the program to fill the gap).

This APAL hub was an invaluable, one-of-a-kind cohort of young, ambitious, motivated, and like-minded doers. We reveled in the rewards of not only our advisor relationship, but also in our peer mentor relationships which deepened over happy-hour program planning and the internet through our private google group where we would dish on our advisor exchanges. The hub served as a catalyst for the LA network and as a support group for members who changed jobs, received promotions, had babies and went to graduate school all between 2008 and 2009. I believe that our professional gratification and, therefore, willingness to remain in the nonprofit arts sector was reinforced by the necessary interactions in planning the APAL program. Bang.

I am most proud of the APAL hub’s self-awareness (we knew the need for mentorship existed) showed willingness to work in order to have the need met! This project provides an ideal platform for emerging leaders to exercise their leadership in a proactive way that counters any misguided perceptions floating around in the field that young professionals are lazy whiners. Now that the pilot program is done and we have served ourselves with an extended network, a seasoned leader connection, and all the riches of those relationships, we are pleased to pass on this unexpectedly rewarding administrative experience to the next class of 20 advisees. It truly can be that through the seemingly unsavory work of administration that peer relationships yield job growth and career satisfaction.

This project highlights the intrinsic value of project-based emerging leader networks where we can build our own platform for leadership in addressing our own professional needs and simultaneously lay a solid foundation for the next emerging leaders to do the same all for the health of the arts field. In fact, it was through this first, project-driven, APAL hub and its members, that the entire EAL/LA network was reborn. BANG.

TAGGED WITH:
3 responses for bang Bang BANG

Comments

August 12, 2010 at 1:18 pm

Hi Letitia! You mentioned that "the success of the advisor/advisee relationships varied," and I was wondering if you could elaborate? I'd be very interested in learning how you define a successful mentoring relationship, and what factors created/impeded success.

More broadly, I often question the effectiveness of local EAL programs at doing more than giving administrative experience to those who are running them. I'd love to see more local programs that can demonstrate clear programmatic outcomes (e.g. in areas like workforce development), which would be a very concrete way to address the ever-present skepticism of the EAL movement. What do you think?

  • Please login to post comments.
Ms. Rachel Ciprotti says
August 12, 2010 at 10:50 am

Great idea! Thanks for sharing this!

  • Please login to post comments.
August 12, 2010 at 5:27 pm

David, while many of the participants had a concept of their dream adviser's profile, they did not necessarily know who in LA's art world matched that make-up nor did they have the contact to that individual. SO, we developed a light application process in which advisees articulated what they sought in a adviser and what their goals were for their year-long mentorship. For the most part, we leveraged one another's connections to match up our fellow advisees (for example, I helped match one of my fellow APALers with my ex-boss). We were proud to have been self-sufficient in this regard, but inevitably, there are some matches that face challenges such as personality disconnects, logistical challenges (ie. getting on someone's calendar 4 times per year), but an example of making lemonade was a pairing where an adviser saw that her advisee would benefit from her connections, perhaps even more than herself. This advisor then opened the door for the advisee to meet up with many of her peers. This was hugely beneficial for the advisee. Tough to give more detail here because we pride ourselves in confidentiality. BUT, as we know, it's through these stumbles that we grow!

  • Please login to post comments.