The Common Core for the Arts are a huge triumph for our professional community—for arts teachers, teaching artists, cultural organizations, supporters, advocates, etc. This is for two reasons:

1.    We’re keeping up with the other subjects.
2.    Three dozen people got together agreed on one giant thing.

Let me explain.

1.    We have to keep up with our peers. We have to pony up the same infrastructure, research, and political mobilization that our peers in the other core subjects are offering.  That’s true if we want arts education to be treated equally. And right now, the Common Core for ELA and math define policy advances (even if we disagree with the content or strategy). But there’s more.

Right now, the new hierarchy of subject has never been clearer: STEM has been named in multiple federal policy initiatives, as has literacy. The other core academic subjects have been lumped together into an “other” category of grantmaking and rank near-last in priority. Should this ever change, it will be because we were just as, if not more organized and on top of our responsibilities to the public education system and to our education leaders. If we want to seriously call into question this misguided hierarchy, we’ll need to do it with flawless precision. We can’t give them any reason to continue to dismiss us as low value in a child’s education. I wouldn’t contend that fitting in is sufficient, but I contend that it is necessary.

2.    The process of building buy-in and consensus among dozens of national organizations—with large, national constituencies—is invaluable to anything that the arts education community hopes to accomplish. I’ve never seen a political anything succeed without broad-based, coalition support. However, I’ve seen a host of people and efforts defeated because support had splintered. A state senator once said, “It’s easy to say no to you if you’re coming to me divided.”

What’s next for the Common Core for the Arts is a lot of work—fundraising, project management, writing, and more consensus building. But what they’ve already gained is impressive. Because of this success—because this is our Common Core—the effort deserves our encouragement, our buy-in, and our active investment. I’ll be volunteering myself.

Congratulations to the individuals from the state agencies and other organizations who made that happen—and to the national leaders who are buying in and doing their part. It’s a very powerful thing and could lead to more and bigger victories.

One Response to “The New Common Core for the Arts are Imperative”

  1. Charley Vance says:

    I teach Talented Theatre in a rural Louisiana parish. Talented Theatre is through Special Education. Students must demonstate a unique ability in the performing arts. They audition to get into the program. My high school students do movies and my elementary and middle school students do Readers Theatre plays. I would like more specific information on how acting fits into the Common Core standards.

Leave a Reply

ARTSblog holds week-long Blog Salons, a series of posts by guest bloggers, that focus on an overarching theme within a core area of Americans for the Arts' work. Here are links to the most recent Salons:

Arts Education

Early Arts Education

Common Core Standards

Quality, Engagement & Partnerships

Emerging Leaders

Taking Communities to the Next Level

New Methods & Models

Public Art

Best Practices

Evaluation

Arts Marketing

Audience Engagement

Winning Audiences

Powered by Community

Animating Democracy

Arts & the Military

Scaling Up Programs & Projects

Social Impact & Evaluation

Humor & Social Change

Private Sector Initatives

Arts & Business Partnerships

Business Models in the Arts

Local Arts Agencies

Cultural Districts

Economic Development

Trends, Collaborations & Audiences

Art in Rural Communities

Alec Baldwin and Nigel Lythgoe talk about the state of the arts in America at Arts Advocacy Day 2012. The acclaimed actor and famed producer discuss arts education and what inspires them.