An ode to an avoidable (but oddly frequent) future for many arts organizations…
You and your friends are going to start an arts organization.
You will probably do it in response to something, like that crappy big arts organization down the street. Their works sucks. Yours will be so much better.
Together you will form a company. You’ll put together a mission statement. It will include words like “enlighten, challenge and inspire.” The mission statement is a lie. The real mission statement of the company is: To showcase us.
This is your fatal flaw. It will be the thing that causes much pain later if you don’t realize this.
You’ll start to produce art. This will be an incredibly good experience. All the positive emotion will lead to some strange reactions within the group.
Company members will begin to date, sleep together and even make marriage plans with eachother.
This will be highly relevant later on.
You’ll start attracting an audience. They will look a lot like the people doing the art, mostly because they are the friends of the people doing the art. Those friends will bring other friends. The audience will grow organically, without much thought about marketing and other such nonsense.
This audience will hit a peak and then begin a sharp drop off as the novelty of friends seeing other friends perform begins to wan. Maybe a few “grey hairs” take their place, but screw that . . . you don’t do art for old people.
At about the same time the passion and fire that began the arts organization is beginning to flicker out. That guy that used to build your sets for free (or at worse a six pack) now he wants money. Those dancers that worked “for the experience”, now they want money. Plus, remember those company members pondering marriage? They damn sure want money because babies can’t be fed on passion.
Someone will say “we need a REAL Board.” This person may or not know what they mean by that statement, but it sounds logical right?
You’ll start having visions of finding some altruistic, wealthy folks who will “support your mission.” By this we mean your stated mission, not your real mission. No one would support your REAL mission. Remember your fatal flaw?
Slowly Board members will trickle in. You’ll assume that because they agreed to be on your Board, they understand their role within the organization. This will prove to be an incorrect assumption. Your fellow company members will never really discuss how they need to function differently because of the presence of new Board members.
You’ll hire your first full time employee. You will treat the new employee and the Board as custodians, people in charge of maintaining the status quo, while at the same time directing them to “bring in money” in support of said status quo. The employee and Board will resist this and suggest some changes. Trouble will brew.
Back to the art . . . notice how I didn’t mention the art for a while? Well, the art is suffering a bit. All these changes and new expectations are throwing people off their artistic game. Plus the long time company members are getting a bit bored.
Conflicts between the money that can be generated and the artistic ambitions will begin to become more frequent. Instead of seeing these challenges as a natural part of doing business you will take these conflicts personally. You’ll actually convince yourself that your new employees and the Board are determined to “stifle the art.” You’ll never really consider how little sense that idea makes.
By now you’ll have company members quit, find “real jobs”, have that baby we talked about before. You will not replace these company members because let’s face it, that wasn’t really the point. Remember your fatal flaw?
That employee you hired? She just quit. You burned her out. Board members, tired of being seen as lazy, no money raising, bums will be quitting soon as well. As for the art? You don’t have the money or infrastructure to support doing it on a high level anymore (remember, that set builder wants money now, not the six pack).
People talk about how cool your company USED to be. But now you guys are just stale and tired. Hell, they could do better then that . . .
So they decide to start an arts organization.
——————————–
I’ll repeat what I said at the top, it’s a common path but an unavoidable one.
One of the keys to avoiding that path is by talking . . . a lot. When you start getting Board members, talk about what that means. When you start seeking donations, talk about what that means.
Your organization will change a ton from the beginning to the end of it’s life cycle, understanding what those changes is vital . . . and constant communication is how that understanding is achieved.
Popularity: 1%

Your anecdote made me LOL. Very funny, and I can see the truth in it – not just for arts organizations, but any nonprofit.
Your post reminds me that branding – the dreaded b-word – is all about conversation: conversation between board and staff, among staff, between staff and constituents, etc. It’s an ongoing process, not something you do every few years to freshen up the organization.
Great post. Thanks for sharing, Adam.
Very true Scarlett. Organizations are changing all the time and unless those changes are constantly discussed and evaluated . . . bad things happen.
Reading through this I see that what is missing is community/communication. I am experiencing this with an arts organization currently. What I found is that it doesn’t have to be a new organization either, the one I’m apart of has been around for years. But the communication is lacking to say the least. Since I’m out in the field doing my art I feel even more distant from the vision and from the original reason I said yes to this position in the first place. Yeah they are a well known name …but who cares.